Simon Schwartzman
The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991TOWARD A SCIENTIFIC ROLE
The Pioneers
Second Generation: Beginnings of Professionalization
Second Generation: The Hard Sciences
Modern Scientists: The Third Generation
Sources of Financial Support
The Rockefeller Foundation in Brazil
Centralized Administration and Scientific Research
Notes
TABLE 1. Physicists and Geologists, First Generation (1892-1907), First Degrees in Brazil | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Specialization and Education | Place of Birth and Family Background |
1892 Lélio Gama | Astronomer and mathematician, Politécnica do Rio de Janeiro | Rio de Janeiro, father a military engineer |
1899 Othon Leonardos | Geologist, Politécnica do Rio de Janeiro | Minas Gerais, father a businessman |
1906 Francisco Magalhães Gomes | Physicist, Escola de Minas de Ouro Preto and Universidade de Minas Gerais | Minas Gerais, father a professor at the Faculdade de Medicina |
1907 Mário da Silva Pinto | Geologist and metallurgist, Politécnica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral | Rio de Janeiro, father a professor at medical school, mother a schoolteacher |
TABLE 2. Biologists, First Generation (1892-1907), First Degrees in Brazil | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Specialization and Education | Place of Birth and Family Background |
1894 Afrânio do Amaral | Tropical medicine, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro, Harvard University | Pará, Brazil, father an entrepreneur (rubber plantation owner) |
1895 Olímpio da Fonseca | Parasitologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro, Manguinhos U.S., and France | Rio de Janeiro, father a medical doctor |
1904 Adolfo Martins Penha | Faculdade de Medicina de Minas Gerais, Manguinhos | Interior of Minas Gerais, parents died early |
1905 Otto Bier | Bacteriologist and immunologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro and Manguinhos | Rio de Janeiro, son of European immigrants |
1907 José Reis | Bacteriologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro, Manguinhos, Instituto Biológico de São Paulo, and Rockefeller Institute | Rio de Janeiro, father a small businessman |
1907 Amílcar Viana Martins | Zoologist, Faculdade de Medicina de Minas Gerais and Rocky Mountain, U.S. | Minas Gerais, father a public employee |
TABLE 3. Scientists Educated Abroad, First Generation (1892-1907) | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Education and Specialization | Place of Birth, Family Background, Year of Arrival |
1889 Gleb Wataghin | Physicist, Turin, Italy | Russia, father an engineer, arrived in São Paulo 1934 |
1900 F. Brieger | Geneticist, University of Breslau, Germany | Germany, father a physician and professor, arrived in São Paulo 1934 |
1902 Quintino Mingóia | Chemist, University of Pavia, Italy | Italy, arrived in São Paulo 1935 |
1903 Guido Beck | Physicist and mathematician, Vienna, Cavendish Laboratory, Leipzig and other places | Arrived in Rio de Janeiro 1951 |
1904 Viktor Leinz | Geologist, University of Heidelberg | Arrived in Rio de Janeiro 1933 |
1905 Bernhard Gross | Physicist, Stuttgart and Electric Research Association, London | Arrived in Rio de Janeiro 1933 |
Table 4. Biologists, Second Generation (1908-1920), First Degrees in Brazil | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Specialization and Education | Place of Birth and Family Background |
1908 José Ribeiro do Vale | Biochemist, Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo, and U.S. | Minas Gerais, father a farmer |
1909 Hugo de Souza Lopes | Entomologist, Escola de Agricultura e Veterinária, Rio de Janeiro | Rio de Janeiro |
1910 Zeferino Vaz | Geneticist, Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo and Instituto Biológico de São Paulo | São Paulo, father a businessman |
1910 Mauricio Rocha e Silva | Biochemist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Biológico de São Paulo, U.S., and England | Rio de Janeiro, father a liberal professional |
1911 Carlos Chagas Filho | Biophysicist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro Instituto Manguinhos and University of Paris | Rio de Janeiro, son of biologist Carlos Chagas |
1911 Herman Lent | Entomologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro and Instituto Manguinhos | Rio de Janeiro, father a small businessman |
1914 Wladimir Lobato Paraense | Parasitologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Pará and Pernambuco, and Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro | Rio de Janeiro |
1914 Mário Viana Dias | Neurophysiologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro and National Institute of Medical Research, U.S. | Rio de Janeiro, several physicians in the family |
1919 Crodowaldo Pavan | Geneticist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP and Columbia University, U.S. | São Paulo, father an entrepreneur |
1929 Manuel da Frota Moreira | Physiologist, Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro and studies in the US and England | Rio de Janeiro, father a physician |
Freire was very stimulating but never became a scientist himself. He was a very competent and brilliant teacher, very stimulating, but he was not a person who could guide and form his students. . . . He was a scholar of the type we can find in all Latin countries. They are extremely knowledgeable professors who get the latest publications and have an incredible personal library in their homes. They know everything, give beautiful lectures, and could teach in any university in the world. But they are not scientists; they do not come down to carry on a limited research work. Freire was a good example of that. He was born in Recife in 1900, studied engineering, became a professor of physics, and wrote a few articles that were published in the Annales de la Physique in France, but I believe he never became a scientist because of the circumstances in which he lived.(13)José Leite Lopes was less enthusiastic, but confirms Freire's influence.(14)
TABLE 5. Physical and Chemical scientists, Second Generation (1908-1920), First Degrees in Brazil | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Specialization and Education | Place of Birth and Family Background |
1908 Simão Mathias | Chemist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP and University of Wisconsin, U.S. | Father a small businessman |
1909 Paulus A. Pompéia | Engineer, Politécnica de São Paulo and University of Chicago | São Paulo, father an engineer |
1914 Mario Schenberg | Engineer and physicist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP; Italy and U.S. | Pernambuco father a European immigrant |
1914 Marcelo Damy de S. Santos | Physicist, Universidade de São Paulo and Cambridge, England | São Paulo |
1917 Pascoal A. Senise | Chemist, Universidade de São Paulo, and Louisiana State University, U.S. | São Paulo, son of Italian immigrants |
1918 José Leite Lopes | Chemist, Universidade de Pernambuco; Physicist, Universidade de São Paulo; Princeton University | Pernambuco, father a small businessman |
1921 Walter B. Mors | Chemist, Universidade de São Paulo, and University of Michigan | São Paulo, family of immigrants |
1920 Otto Gottlieb | Chemist, Escola Nacional de Química, Rio de Janeiro, England, and Israel | Czechoslovakia, secondary education in Europe; arrived in Brazil with his family before World War II |
1920 Jaime Tiomno | Physicist, Universidade do Distrito Federal and Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade do Brasil; Princeton | Rio de Janeiro, son of immigrant, small businessman |
TABLE 6. Physical and Chemical Scientists, Third Generation (1921-1931) | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Specialization and Education | Place of Birth and Family Background |
1921 Blanka Wladislaw | Chemist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP | Poland, family arrived in Brazil in 1935 |
1921 Ernesto Giesbrecht | Chemist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP | Father a civil engineer |
1922 Oscar Sala | Physicist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP, and Illinois and Wisconsin, U.S. | Italy, family of immigrants, did all his studies in Brazil |
1923 Aluísio Pimenta | Pharmacist, Universidade de Minas Gerais | Minas Gerais, father had a pharmacy |
1924 Jacques Danon | Chemist, Escola Nacional de Química, Rio de Janeiro, and Paris | Father a small businessman |
1924 Cesare Lattes | Physicist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP, and Princeton, U.S. | Parana, family of Italian immigrants, father a bank clerk |
1925 Paulo Leal Ferreira | Physicist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP and Rome | Rio de Janeiro, father an engineer |
1925 Jean Meyer | Physicist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP, and École Politechnique, Paris | Dantzig (Gdansk), secondary studies in Europe, family of immigrants |
1926 Sérgio Porto | Chemist, Faculdade de Filosofia, USP, and physics, Johns Hopkins University and Bell Laboratories, U.S. | Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, father a small businessman |
1928 Roberto Salmeron | Engineer, Faculdade de Engenharia, USP; Faculdade de Filosofia, Rio de Janeiro and Manchester, England | Rio de Janeiro |
1928 José Israel Vargas | Chemist, Universidade de Minas Gerais; physicist, Universidade de São Paulo, and Cambridge University | Minas Gerais, father a small industrialist |
1928 José Goldemberg | Physicist, Universidade de São Paulo, and studies in Canada | Rio de Janeiro, father an engineer |
1928 Ricardo Ferreira | Chemist, Pernambuco, physicist, Universidade de São Paulo, and California Institute of Technology, U.S. | Pernambuco, father a small businessman |
1930 Gerhard Jacob | Mathematician and physicist, Faculdade de Filosofia, Rio Grande do Sul | Germany, family of immigrants |
1931 Rogério Cerqueira Leite | Engineer, Instituto Tecnológico da Aeronáutica, and physicist, Bell Laboratories, U.S. | São Paulo |
TABLE 7. Biologists, Third Generation (1921-1931) | ||
Year of Birth and Name | Specialization and Education | Place of Birth and Family Background |
1922 Warwick Kerr | Geneticist, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz | São Paulo, father a. specialized worker |
1923 Paulo Emílio Vanzolini | Zoologist, Universidade de São Paulo and Harvard University | São Paulo, father an engineer related to the Escola Politécnica in São Paulo |
1925 Antônio Cordeiro | Geneticist, Faculdade ole Filosofia, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, and Columbia University | Rio Grande do Sul, father a. military officer |
1928 Francisco M. Salzano | Geneticist, Faculdade de Filosofia, Rio Grande do Sul | Rio Grande do Sul, father a physician |
I had the chance to follow the courses of mathematical analysis with Luigi Fantappié, geometry with Giacomo Albanese, and physics with Gleb Wataghin. We met a completely different world. In our education as future engineers, we still had the type of lectures so common in most of the Brazilian universities: the professor comes in, delivers his lecture, and walks away, without talking with the students and often teaching from an obsolete book. These professors were not researchers; they had other professions and taught only a few hours a week. For most, their own education was very deficient. There was strong inbreeding in the school, with one engineer training another for teaching basic disciplines. Be cause of that we believed disciplines like mathematics, chemistry, and physics were the study of things that were completely solved, crystallized, dead. For us, physics was something that resided in the books of physics; the same held for chemistry and mathematics. It was a surprise for us when we attended lectures that followed a completely different approach, that showed us these sciences were not only alive but going through such intense change that the amount of research published in the last few years had been greater than the amount since the beginnings of these sciences. . . . We also came in touch with something that was totally unknown in Brazil-the seminars. Each week the Italians and the Germans, who taught chemistry, would get together to present their research or the main lines of fundamental research being developed abroad. Then there was an open interchange of views. For us - young students used to listening without questioning - it was strange to hear a professor raise questions about and strongly criticize the work of a colleague. Very often the criticism was correct, but that did not mean the researchers would not remain friends and that life would not continue as always. So we learned that science was alive. It could be developed, it was being developed in the rest of the world, and this possibility was opened also to Brazil.(16)From the initial group of foreign professors a new model of scientist, which would have an extremely important role in the years to come, was built. The testimony of Gleb Wataghin allows us to see how this was done:
I came from Italy with Fantappié. We received from the Faculdade de Filosofia one office, and we were told to teach. We asked for a library... I was lucky. I found very able and interested young men without doing anything toward it. Who could assure a young man in 1934 that if he followed a course during three or four years he could become a professional physicist? Anyhow, they wanted to do science and I taught them what they wanted. Among them was Marcelo Damy de Sousa Santos, Mário Schenberg, and later Paulus A. Pompéia. In the Escola Politécnica, where I taught, I tried to tell the students that one could not do several different things at once. Then some of them decided to leave the engineering courses and dedicate themselves to physics. They knew about electricity, how to build radios, antennas. . . . Because of that, it was easy for them to work in experimental physics. . . . As much as possible I tried to send them to Europe after two or three years of study. I sent Mário Schenberg to my friend Dirac, who I believe is the most important physicist alive. I went to Europe with Schenberg; we went through Italy on the way to England. I met Fermi and asked him to talk with Schenberg. It was then that Fermi convinced Schenberg to work with him. I did the same thing with the experimental physicists. Some, like Lattes, went to Cambridge, England. They would write to me, showing solutions to technical problems-how to improve a circuit we had done here, for instance. I learned a lot from my students, and I trained them with the help of great physicists from all over Eu rope, Germany, England, and Italy. . . . Contact with Europe was essential. The only condition I had when I came here was that I wanted to spend two or three months each year in Europe. This was very good for me and for Brazil.(17)The impact of foreign professors in the biological sciences was less pronounced, probably because there was already a much more developed tradition of research in these fields. Besides, the German professors of zoology and botany-Breslau, Marcus, and Rawitscher-belonged to well-established traditions of taxonomic research that were stronger than but not so different from what was already being done in Brazil. They did not have the appeal of novelty that came with physics. An important exception was Friedrich Brieger, who came to the Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz and who, with Dreyfus, was responsible for the beginnings of genetics research in Brazil.
Scientific activity was considered a cultural activity, and few people, in Brazil or elsewhere, believed that scientific research could be an instrument for power, wealth, and development. The contribution of scientific research and scientific knowledge to economic and military power is a novelty that was recognized only after the atomic bomb was produced with knowledge derived from basic and pure research. Although we had many examples of how scientific research, scientific knowledge, and technology could be useful for development of a country, it is striking that it was seldom considered as such.(20)Thus, to get support, scientists had to prove their practical worth. In 1935 Arthur Neiva organized a short-lived Diretoria Geral de Pesquisas Científicas within the Ministry of Agriculture, Industry, and Commerce, which was supposed to bring together institutions like the Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia, the Laboratório Nacional da Produção Mineral, an institute of meteorology, and an institute of animal biology to be headed by Alvaro Osório de Almeida. Its practical orientation was obvious. This Diretoria would have been the first federal agency directly responsible for scientific activities in the country, but it never really got off the ground; after a conflict between Fonseca Costa, director of the Instituto de Tecnologia, and the minister of agriculture, the institute moved to another ministry and the whole project was abandoned. The idea of scientific planning was already capturing minds, and in 1938 Chagas went to Paris to learn about the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique headed by Jean Perrin and established by the Curies in the years of the Popular Front. Chagas took all the documentation related to the CNRS to Minister of Education Gustavo Capanema, who was "extremely interested," as Chagas recalls it, but completely unable to raise the interest of President Vargas. Only much later, in 1951, would a national research center be created.
TABLE 8. Rockefeller Foundation Contributions to Science, Research, and Education in Brazil, 1932-1975 (Thousand Dollars) | |||||||
Period | Public Health | Medicine | Natural Sciences | Social Sciences | Agriculture | Others | Total |
1930-33 | 1,719 |
1,719 |
|||||
1936-40 | 1,117 |
1,117 |
|||||
1941-45 | 634 |
6 |
10 |
10 |
661 |
||
1946-50 | 392 |
80 |
5 |
18 |
40 |
537 |
|
1951-55 | 49 |
224 |
84 |
-- |
265 |
76 |
699 |
1956-60 | 190 |
1,466 |
592 |
286 |
955 |
144 |
3,634 |
1961-65 | 127 |
411 |
419 |
8 |
345 |
49 |
1,365 |
1966-70 | 319 |
37 |
235 |
2 |
168 |
-- |
611 |
1971-75 |
11 |
-- |
-- |
450 |
-- |
-- |
462 |
SOURCE: Calculated from the Rockefeller Foundation's annual reports (V. M. C. Pereira 1978). |
to agglomerate, bring together, and strengthen the similarities of the federated states in the spirit of national Brazilian communion - this was the main task the government instituted under the new political system, beginning with strengthening the authority of the central power, expanding borders, eliminating local differences, and merging of rural and urban states and communities into one nation. Unifying educational systems-not by adopting identical teaching structures but by adopting the same basic guide lines or in other words by organizing public education according to a general policy and joint plans-is one way (certainly the most powerful and efficacious way) the new regime intended to attain national assimilation and reconstruction.(29)The fact is that the strengthening of the central government and the attempts to place the state bureaucracy under the aegis of rational management and "scientific administration" had the unintended consequence of putting much of the scientific research that still existed in the country's capital into disarray, without leaving much in its place. In 1937 the Departamento Nacional do Serviço Público (National Department of Civil Service) was established under Luis Simões Lopes a close adviser to Getúlio Vargas, with the task of bringing all Brazil's public administration under control. For the first time, such ideas as the merit system, professionalization, careers, technical training of civil servants, and utilization of scientific methods in administration were brought to Brazil. The assumption was that state dirigisme would only increase in the years to come and that it required a strong, centralized, and scientifically minded public service. The larger ambitions never materialized, but the impact of the department in the daily life of Brazilian public institutions was long-lasting.(30)