Simon Schwartzman
The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD
Science and Tecnology for Economic Development
The 1968 Reform of Higher Education
The New Graduate Programs
High Technology Institutions
Big Science and High Technology
Notes
[Pelúcio Ferreira] said that by the middle of the 1960s, although physicists and economists developed their ideas separately they had converged to create an awareness of science and technology dependency. The economists' emphasis on the linkages between technology and economic development was particularly important. Pelúcio has acknowledged that both ídéias cepalinas and the ISEB [Instituto Superior de Estudos Brasileiros, a think tank in io de Janeiro closed by the military in 1964] had a considerable effect on his subsequent work in the science and technology field.(1)The other trend was the military government's nationalist ambitions, which began to take shape after the 1960s and peaked in the mid-1970s. In the 1960s, South American military regimes were known for their ideological and doctrinaire approximation of the United States, for their economic liberalism, and supposedly for their concern with reducing the role of the state in all spheres of activity - except of course for control of political participation and expression. In that sense, they were opposed to the trend represented by CEPAL or such scientists as Leite Lopes, who supported increasing state planning and intervention to redress the effects of dependency. The most extreme example is probably Chile, which became a test case for Chicago-style economics orthodoxy. Economic liberalism was also central to the first Brazilian military regime headed by General Castelo Branco after 1964. The orthodox economic policies of those years were effective in controlling inflation, increasing the government's tax base, modernizing the government's instruments of economic policymaking, and attracting foreign capital.
TABLE 10. Growth of the Educational System in Brazil, 1965-1980 (1970 = 100) | ||||
1965 | 1970 | 1975 | 1980 | |
Population | 87.3 | 100 | 115.0 | 127.8 |
High-school graduates | 49.3 | 100 | 163.1 | 239.6 |
Vacancies for higher education | 39.7 | 100 | 240.1 | 279.3 |
Applicants for higher education institutions | 33.7 | 100 | 237.5 | 548.5 |
Undergraduate enrollment | 34.2 | 100 | 212.0 | 294.9 |
Enrollment in private institutions | 28.3 | 100 | 245.3 | 353.7 |
Enrollment in public universities | 100 | 164.0 | 238.2 | |
Source: Education data from Ministério da Educação, Serviço de Estatistica da Educação e Cultura; population data from Brazilian censuses. |
Table 11 - Students Enrolled in Graduate Programs, by Field (1975-1983) (thousands) | ||||||||
Year | Hard Sciences | Biological | Engineering | Health | Agriculture | Social, applied | Social, humanities | Total |
1975 | 2,898 | 2,196 | 2,421 | 2,111 | 1,811 | 10,808 | 22,245 | |
1976 | 3,751 | 2,172 | 3,491 | 3,028 | 1,942 | 11,871 | 26,255 | |
1977 | 4,362 | 2,405 | 3,969 | 3,370 | 2,374 | 15,052 | 31,532 | |
1978 | 4,829 | 2,761 | 5,442 | 3,612 | 2,857 | 14,130 | 33,631 | |
1979 | 4,755 | 2,951 | 5,459 | 3,771 | 3,018 | 16,654 | 36,608 | |
1980 | 4,936 | 3,054 | 5,644 | 4,216 | 3,145 | 17,611 | 38,606 | |
1981 | 5,170 | 3,137 | 5,715 | 4,677 | 2,709 | 18,776 | 40,184 | |
1982 | 4,385 | 2,852 | 5,391 | 4,658 | 2,728 | 6,479 | 12,737 | 39,230 |
1983 | 4,264 | 2,913 | 4,990 | 4,561 | 2,709 | 6,452 | 9,961 | 35,850 |
SOURCE: Paulinyi et al. 1986.Social sciences and humanities were counted together until 1981; from then on, applied social sciences (social work, administration, communications, and so forth) are counted separately |
I will make it a wonderful garden, with the natural beauty of flowers, trees, stones, and water. This will be the Greek agora, and all units will converge on it... The agora is attractive, and students and professors meet there to discuss and exchange ideas and concepts. You can find there the geneticist, the physicist, the physician, the botanist, the chemist, and the Faculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos. Multidisciplinary programs emerge everywhere, stimulated by the layout - because the circle provides a concept of unity: there are no privileged positions or sides. All converge on this plaza, which symbolizes the well-being of mankind. I wanted to create a university like an organism in which the different organs - physicists, mathematicians, naturalists, philosophers, artists - all worked together for the preservation of the community's physical, mental, and spiritual well-being.(10)Less romantic was his practice. Based on his reputation, and with financial support from the state and federal government, Vaz initiated an effort to bring back Brazilian scientists who had left the country in the previous years. In his interview Vaz told about his personal contacts and the support received from Finance Secretary Dilson Funaro at the state level and from powerful names in the federal economic and planning agencies, such as Minister of Finance Delfim Neto, Marcos Viana at the Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico, José Pelúcio Ferreira at the Financiadora de Estudos de Projetos, and João Bautista Vidal at the Secretaria de Tecmologia Industrial.
A friendly relationship between professors and the officers at the BNDE was established. It was very gratifying, very pleasant. They shared the problems of the university and helped out when payment was delayed for some reason. The first bylaws for the fund were written at COPPE. At first they had only engineering, but we included physics, mathematics, and chemistry because one cannot do graduate education in engineering without the basic sciences... We also helped establish the graduate program in mathematics at the Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada.(16)Money began to flow in 1967 and peaked in 1973. COPPE established a bewildering variety of cooperation agreements with persons and institutions all over the world. Its catalog for 1971 mentions the Organization of American States, the Fullbright Commission, the Rockefeller Foundation, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the governments of France, England, the Netherlands, the Soviet Union, and Germany.
We created the graduate programs for a Brazil that did not exist and still does not exist, which did not correspond to what we expected to happen. We were throwing into the market a sophisticated product meant for the country's technological development. We imagined that if we did our part in forming creative people in engineering, they would be absorbed by a country that really wanted to create its own technology. But it never happened... Brazil does not need M.A.'s and doctors, not even five-year engineers. Operational engineers are enough, since we will keep handling imported factories forever.(21)Other opinions were more balanced but pointed in the same direction:
I am almost sure that COPPE is full of defects, in the sense that it goes too far ahead of Brazil's reality and is too sophisticated with regard to the practical side of the productive activities in many fields... The industries were completely resistant to any participation of this kind, now or in the past. Our industrial development was based exclusively on the importation of foreign technology, on multinational corporations, or on the acquisition of foreign patents by Brazilian companies.(22)A more precise picture can be gathered from an analysis of data on student graduation and their future work (see Table 12). Between 1964 and 1978, only twenty-five students received doctoral degrees. Only about 20 percent of the master's students ever got their degrees, and 50 percent abandoned the courses without getting their credits. These low rates of completion and graduation are similar to what is found in most graduate courses throughout Brazil. In that sense, COPPE is not exceptional, but it is obviously no less troublesome.
TABLE 12. COPPE: Graduation, Enrollment, Desertion, and Destination of Students, 1965-1978 | |||||
Field and year of creation | Ph.D.'s | Master's Degrees | Master's Enrollment | Desertion | Destinations* |
Chemical engineering (1963) | 4 | 124 | 437 | 52.6% | Teaching, public companies |
Mechanical engineering (1966) | 3 | 66 | 268 | 48.5% | Teaching, private companies |
Electrical engineering (1966) | 1 | 86 | 699 | 60.9% | Public companies, teaching |
Metallurgy (1966) | 2 | 59 | 368 | 30.2% | Teaching, public companies |
Civil engineering (1967) | 6 | 139 | 942 | 65.5% | Teaching, doctoral programs |
Production (1967) | 3 | 140 | 852 | 68.9% | Public companies, teaching |
Naval (1967) | 25 | 97 | 43.3% | Teaching | |
Nuclear (1968) | 87 | 329 | 44.3% | Doctoral programs, teaching | |
Systems engineering (1971) | 6 | 109 | 660 | 49.1% | Teaching, doctoral programs |
Biomedical (1971) | 21 | 120 | 33.3% | Teaching | |
Business administration (1975) | 12 | 160 | 20.6% | Public companies | |
SOURCE: Nunes, Souza & Schwartzman, 1982:241-42. *Main Occupation of those who obtained their master's degrees. Two occupations are given when the figures are close. |